Main Menu

Home

GMD Commissioners

About Us

Customer Service

Education & Tours

Public Information

County Links

County GIS System

 

GMD Public Information

Public Menu2006 Minutes - 2007 Minutes - 2008 Minutes

Commission Minutes

GREENWOOD METROPOLITAN DISTRICT

MINUTES OF THE March 25, 2009

Regular meeting

 

The regular meeting of the Greenwood Metropolitan District Commission was held Wednesday, February 25, 2008 at 3:00 p.m., in the Training Room of Greenwood Metropolitan District’s Technical Service Facility, 110 Metro Drive, Greenwood, SC 29646.

 

In attendance:

Commissioner Bob Haynie, Chairman                     Richard Coleman

Commissioner Byron Smith, Vice Chairman            George Martin

Commissioner Gene Hancock, Secretary                 Doug Bell

Commissioner            Michael G. Monaghan           Gayle Grogan

Commissioner            Henry Watts                           Paige Holley

Commissioner Tim Burke                                         Danny Ware

 

Chairman Haynie left the Board Meeting early to attend the funeral of Mr. Thornwell Dunlap.

 

I.          Chairman Haynie called the meeting to order and gave the statement of compliance with the notification provision of the 

         Freedom of Information Act.

 

II.          Mr. Martin gave the invocation. 

 

III.          Wilson Creek Upgrade

Mr. Danny Ware of Davis and Floyd, Inc (D&F) noted the monthly report was emailed to all Commissioners.  He distributed a change order summary sheet.  Mr. Ware said April 13th is the tie-in date for flow to the influent pump station and the grit removal.  The contractor’s insurance company approved demolishing the clarifier that floated up.  The process should take 5 weeks.  There were detailed talks at the monthly construction meeting regarding different processes that would allow the BNR #1 to be placed into operation with the clarifier.  If a new plan is not found, then replacing the clarifier will affect the project schedule by six months.  The contractor was two to three months ahead of schedule prior to the clarifier problem.  Now that the contractor has to demolish the clarifier and rebuild it, according to their monthly report they are three to four months behind the project deadline.  Davis and Floyd, Metro and the contractor are working hard to come up with a method that will allow the contractor to proceed with the second BNR without having to wait on clarifier #4 to get rebuilt.  Wilson Creek staff has moved to the temporary trailer offices.  Construction of the new control building has begun.  Chairman Haynie wanted to know the proper procedure for handling the clarifier issue.  He asked if there would be a change order issued.  Mr. Ware responded no, currently there is no discussion concerning additional cost to Metro.  Chairman Haynie inquired if there would be a change order in terms of the contract time line.  Mr. Ware said as far as D&F are concerned that issue is between the contractor and his insurance company.  Chairman Haynie and Commissioner Watts both asked about the time.  Mr. Ware said the contractor is in control of their time line and if the project exceeds the contract time, liquidated damages should be enforced.  Chairman Haynie noted that Mr. Ware said it could take the contractor up to six months to build the new clarifier.  Mr. Ware said that is correct.  He said six months is the overall effect, but it is only adding a few months to the end date because the contractor was ahead of schedule.  Chairman Haynie wanted to make sure that Mr. Ware was stating the contractor is subject to liquidate damages.  Mr. Ware replied yes.  He said August 5, 2010 is the final completion date for this project; the schedule that the contractor presented at the monthly meeting based on the clarifier pushed their completion date to November, 2010. Based on how the contract stands the contractor would be subjected to liquidated damages from August 5, 2010 to November, 2010.  Chairman Haynie asked if the contractor’s insurance company would pay the liquidated damages.  Mr. Ware said he does not know.  Commissioner Watts asked if Metro has the option to enforce liquidated damages.  Mr. Ware replied the Commission can choose not to enforce liquidated damages.  Commissioner Monaghan said their bid price could include some liquidated damages.  Commissioner Burke suggested that the Commission looks at enforcing or not enforcing the liquidated damages in June/July of 2010. 

 

IV.          TSF Expansion

Mr. Martin gave an update on the expansion and the move from the main office.  Punch list items will be sent to the contractor in two weeks. 

 

V.          Commissioner Hancock made a motion to approve the February 25, 2009 minutes as mailed; Commissioner Smith

          seconded, and the motion was unanimously approved.

 

VI.          Financial Report

Manager Coleman said based on the periodic review from Standard and Poor’s Metro was upgraded one tick; that information should be received in writing by the end of the week.  The collections are still behind.  Chairman Haynie asked if there was any discussion regarding the resolution of collecting tax money at the County Council meeting.  Manager Coleman said this was not discussed.  Commissioner Monaghan said County Council does not discuss anything in public session.  Commissioner Monaghan said based on the comments the collections are down.  He said the sewer service income is $252,000 better than this time last year; the operating revenue is over $652,000 better than this time last year.  He said it is note worthy that Metro has $3.1 million (not including depreciation) to fund capital projects and debt retirement.  Commissioner Monaghan said the debt principle for the balance of the year is $769,000, but $470,000 is going for GO Bond debt and that amount comes from the County property tax account.  He said Metro is in pretty good shape even though they are under budget.  Commissioner Monaghan said if the budget is correct, Metro is behind.  He said just looking atlast year compared to this year Metro is ahead.  Commissioner Monaghan wanted to know why budgeted depreciation is so much less than actual.  He asked if that was from adding new projects.  Mrs. Grogan said three projects (Lander, Bailey and Cambridge) have been added this year.  Commissioner Monaghan asked why those projects were not included in the budgeted amount.  Mr. Martin said the reason why Lander was not included is Metro only adds them once the final payment has been made.  Commissioner Monaghan said when Metro does the budget they must anticipate adding these assets.  Commissioner Burke said Lander and Bailey were supposed to be in last year’s budget but since the final payment was not made until this fiscal year they were not included in this year’s budget.  Commissioner Monaghan asked if during the budget process does Metro look at what projects will be finished and tries to estimate the depreciation for budget.  Mr. Martin said the Lander project has been three year of waiting for the final punch list items to be completed; Bailey Circle was added after the mediation was finished.  Commissioner Monaghan said he would like to know the procedure for doing the depreciation part of the budget.  Commissioner Monaghan asked if the GO Bond money could be used for the Turner Branch Project.  Manager Coleman said Metro could spend GO Bond revenues but not tax revenues.  Commissioner Monaghan wanted to know where Metro was going to spend the $25,000.  Mrs. Grogan said the money is the 06 GO Bond Proceeds account has been used on Turner Branch; that account now has a zero balance.  She said the only bond money left is the 2008 Revenue Bond Proceed Account.  Commissioner Monaghan said the bottom line of the millage account is $1,893,208.  He noted that Metro will pay $470,000 for bond principle and $126,000 on interest by the end of this fiscal year; that leaves $1,279,000 left in the account without any additional tax revenue.  Chairman Haynie stated Metro is moving forward on issuing a new bond for using the tax revenue.  Commissioner Monaghan asked if Metro was going to spend all of the money.  Chairman Haynie said Metro will spend that plus the amount that Metro plans to borrow.  Commissioner Monaghan said the tax revenue money can only be used for bond principle and interest.  Chairman Haynie said that is correct.  Commissioner Monaghan asked if Metro was going to spend $1.279 million in bond principle and interest by the end of the fiscal year.  Commissioner Burke said that is why there will be an expedited payment.  Manager Coleman said there will still be an October payment before Metro collects again.  He said Metro is on a fiscal year that ends June 30th and the County tax income comes in December-February (estimated 85% of tax money is received).  Commissioner Monaghan wanted to know how much more Metro anticipates collecting.  Manager Coleman said about 1% comes in each month from March – November.  He said the amount of money that is in the account when Metro sends the resolution over for the next year’s debt amount; the County will calculate the millage amount.  Chairman Haynie said Metro was calculating this balance in addition to the bond issuance so that Metro could use as much of that money as possible.  Manager Coleman said Metro does not have the schedule for the new bond issuance payment.  Metro is going to have an escalated first payment.  Commissioner Monaghan said Metro is looking at $1,279,000 and including normal tax collections Metro will have another $400,000 coming in before the end of the fiscal year.  Chairman Haynie said the collected amount will drop off.  Commissioner Monaghan said the total for December – February is $749,464.  Chairman Haynie said that is when the majority of the money is collected.  He said the Treasurer noted that they were expecting to collect less than budgeted this year, because of people not paying their taxes.  Commissioner Monaghan said instead of $400,000 say $300,000; Metro is still looking at $1.6 million.  He asked if Metro was going to spend $1.6 million in bond principle and interest before Metro receives more tax money.  Commissioner Monaghan wants Metro to look at the numbers very carefully to make sure they take out all the money available.  Chairman Haynie said that is the whole idea.  He said it is difficult because the bond cannot exceed the 8% cap amount.  Manager Coleman said Metro is trying to maximize the amount of money Metro can use.  He said the account will never have a true zero balance.  Commissioner Monaghan said he is afraid that the residual amount of money may affect the amount of taxes the County will let Metro collect.  Manager Coleman said it will.  Commissioner Monaghan wants to minimize the residual money as much as possible.  Manager Coleman said if any money is leftover at the end of the year it is suppose to be taken into account for how much money is needed for the following year.  Chairman Haynie said Metro does not want to be put back in the position where the County is using Metro’s reserves to lower the tax to mask County Councils tax increases.  Commissioner Monaghan wanted to know how the inventory numbers are calculated for each area (Supply House, West Alexander, Wilson Creek, etc.).  Mrs. Grogan said the inventory for the supply house is done every month and the other areas are done on a quarterly basis.  Commissioner Monaghan asked if the supply house takes an inventory and provide the numbers every month.  Mrs. Grogan said that is the distribution from the warehouse.  Commissioner Monaghan asked if a physical inventory is done by hand or is it a computer generated report.  Mrs. Grogan said it is a computer generated report.  Commissioner Monaghan asked if a periodic count is done to account for lost items.  Mrs. Grogan said the physical inventory is done on a quarterly basis.  Commissioner Monaghan wanted to know if something is given to Mrs. Grogan so she can adjust the inventory balance.  Mrs. Grogan said she is not sure if Mr. Woody Smith sends paperwork saying what amount to adjust the inventory by.  Mr. Martin said he will make sure that information is accounted for in the inventory reports.  Commissioner Monaghan inquired if the other areas are physical inventories or computer generated.  Mrs. Grogan responded the other areas are all physical inventories.  Commissioner Monaghan wanted to know what the abbreviations mean (i.e. G-2 Master Plan).  Mrs. Grogan replied that is the Master Plan that Manager Coleman had drawn up.  Commissioner Monaghan noted the value is $124,240.10.  He wanted to know why that is considered an asset.  Manager Coleman said it was a large expense to be depreciated instead of expensed in a given year.  Commissioner Monaghan asked for more detailed information on the Master Plan.  Manager Coleman said he will ask the auditors.  Commissioner Monaghan asked for a description on what the numbers mean that are with some projects i.e. T-11, T-12, S-1, etc.  Mrs. Grogan said those project numbers were assigned in the Long Range Plan.  Commissioner Monaghan wanted to know who assigned the numbers.  Mrs. Grogan said she does not know who assigned the numbers.  Commissioner Monaghan said he would like to understand the balance sheet better.  Manager Coleman said those letters (T, G, S, & W) came from the financial plan.  The letters stand for transmission, general; sludge and wastewater treatment plant).  Commissioner Monaghan said those abbreviations are not used anymore.  Commissioner Monaghan wanted to know what equipment is listed under miscellaneous equipment.  Mrs. Grogan said miscellaneous equipment is anything that is not already accounted for.  Commissioner Monaghan said he is worried about all the items that are received as miscellaneous supplies.  He wanted to know if that is a part of the miscellaneous equipment.  Mrs. Grogan replied no, Metro does not have a miscellaneous supply expensed item.  She said this account is for tools and equipment items.  Mr. Martin said this account is for pumps and equipment.  Mrs. Grogan said these are big items.  Commissioner Monaghan asked when a purchasing report is received that said miscellaneous supply and invoice what is done with it.  Mrs. Grogan said there is no expense account for miscellaneous supplies.  Commissioner Monaghan said he has copies of the received purchase order reports where the item is listed as miscellaneous supplies; that is why he is questioning it.  Mrs. Grogan said miscellaneous equipment is for capital items; this is not an expense account.  Commissioner Burke said it should be in the O&M account for small tools and equipment.  Mrs. Grogan said the 1900 accounts are capital accounts.  Commissioner Monaghan said he did not see an account on the O&M.  Mrs. Grogan said the O&M does not have a miscellaneous expense account.  Commissioner Monaghan asked if the receiving report is ignored and the invoice used.  Mrs. Grogan said there is nothing coded to miscellaneous equipment.  She said Metro has tools and equipment but there is not a line item for miscellaneous equipment.  Commissioner Monaghan said he will show Mrs. Grogan what he is talking about after the meeting.  Commissioner Monaghan wanted to know when the new GO Bond will be issued.  Manager Coleman said the County had the first reading and it will take a total of three reading from the County before the bond can be issued.  Commissioner Burke said the entire process from reading to issuances is 120 days.  Metro is just in the first few weeks of it.  Manager Coleman said he has a schedule from the bond attorney that he will forward to the Board.  He said the bond will be issued in this fiscal year.  Commissioner Monaghan asked if the CPW system listed on the balance sheet is the City’s sewer lines.  Manager Coleman said that amount is what was taken from the CPW’s books; Metro could only add the amount of value that was given.  Commissioner Burke suggested the values of the systems should be re-evaluate.  He said the items are depreciated; how long have the lines been there and are all the lines fully depreciated.  Commissioner Monaghan said there is $450,000 depreciated out.  Commissioner Burke said those are much older lines; similar to that of Gatewood.  He asked if the lines have already reached their depreciated end.  Commissioner Burke said it would still be a good thing to re-evaluate the lines.  Commissioner Monaghan said it would help with bonds.  Commissioner Burke agreed with Commissioner Monaghan’s statement.  Commissioner Monaghan said the goal of Metro should be to be as realistic as possible.  Manager Coleman said Metro cannot accept something from CPW’s books that says they have a depreciated valve of $1.5 million and add it to Metro’s book for $15 million.  Commissioner Burke wanted to know what would happen when Metro replaces the inner working parts of a pump station.  He asked if a new depreciation schedule would be started for the pump station.  Manager Coleman said if the pump station is not depreciated out, Metro will write the balance off and start back depreciating the new amount.  He said it is the same thing that is done for sewer lines that have been rehabilitated.  Commissioner Burke said when the City system is rehabed it comes on as a new system.  Manager Coleman said Metro does not keep up with in the city or out of the city.  Commissioner Monaghan wanted to know how much money is determined to be deprecated each month.  Commissioner Burke said the auditors have that schedule.  Manager Coleman said different items have different life value.  Commissioner Monaghan wanted to know who is calculates the values.  Manager Coleman said the auditors.  Commissioner Monaghan wanted to know what steps are taken if a vehicle is sold and some of the vehicle has been depreciated.  Commissioner Burke said if the vehicle is sold for more than the depreciated value the vehicle is added back on then Metro would dispose of the asset.  Commissioner Monaghan wanted to know what Commissioner Burke meant by adding it back on.  Commissioner Monaghan said Metro would add it into the depreciation.  Commissioner Burke said as a plus amount.  Commissioner Monaghan wanted to know why he would do that.  Commissioner Burke said because Metro is taking advantage of the depreciation of an asset that has now been disposed.  Commissioner Monaghan wanted to know who is responsible for making that calculation.  Commissioner Burke replied the federal government.  Mrs. Grogan said the auditors help her to make some of the calculations.  Commissioner Burke said there are federal guidelines for depreciation schedules.  Mrs. Grogan said especially if the item has not been fully depreciated.  Commissioner Monaghan said the only reason he is talking about this at all is that the higher Metro’s assets are the more favorable Metro is to bond issuers.  He said that is his understanding.  Manager Coleman said he does not know if that is true.  Commissioner Monaghan asked for Manager Coleman to find out.  Manager Coleman explained to the Commission the way he understands the bond issuers look at Metro’s finances.  He said for Revenue Bonds the issuer look at the ability for Metro to pay based on the revenues minus expenses and current debt; depreciation is not calculated in those numbers.  Commissioner Monaghan said he is talking about assets.  Manager Coleman said assets are not the number calculated in there; it is cash flow.  Commissioner Monaghan asked if assets were calculated it the ratings.  Manager Coleman said how Metro is rated takes into account all of that; the higher the rating the lower the interest rate.  He said for GO Bonds they look at taxing authority.  Commissioner Hancock said it is based on the amount of money Metro has and the ability of the customers to pay their utility bill.  Commissioner Monaghan suggested have a procedure book on how Metro handles depreciation, inventory, purchasing, receiving, fixed assets, etc.  Commissioner Burke inquired if the auditor could provide Metro with how many years are left on each assets life.  Mrs. Grogan said she can look that up in the depreciation software.  Mr. Martin asked if the Commission would like for staff to re-evaluate the value of the City lines.  Commissioner Burke said it is not worth it, because the lines have no liquid value. 

 

VII.          Action Items

a.      Ratify emergency repair expenditure

 

Commissioner Hancock made a motion to approve the emergency repair expenditure on Bond Avenue for $18,750; Commissioner Watts seconded, and the motion was unanimously approved. 

 

VIII.          Other/Old Business

a.      GASB 45

Manager Coleman said the GASB 45 information in the commission packet is for information only.  Metro is working on gathering all information for GASB 45.  They are working together with CPW.  Manager Coleman said the report is giving the actuary tabulation of how much money Metro needs for the commitment for retiree health benefits based on the current number of employees.  The number is $3,255,000.  This can be funded by a $421,000 flat annual contribution or $348,000 increasing 3% every year.  This number will be re-evaluated every two to three years.  Commissioner Hancock said if Metro had to fund it right now these are the numbers that it would have to be, but right now Metro does not have to fund it.  Commissioner Monaghan said he does not understand.  He said the CPW Commissioners were told that GASB 45 has been delayed.  Manager Coleman said Mrs. Laurie Smith of Elliot Davis has told Metro it is due at the end of fiscal year 2009.  He said nothing has changed on that for Metro.  Commissioner Monaghan will check with CPW to see if there is a delay.  Chairman Haynie said Metro has budgeted $200,000 this year.  He asked if Metro would need to make up the difference.  Manager Coleman said if nothing else was to change, Metro will need to make up the difference.  He has not received any confirmation that the numbers have changed.  Chairman Haynie said Metro will need to budget for that each year.  Commissioner Monaghan wants something in writing.  Manager Coleman said this is the first thing Metro has received.  Chairman Haynie said Commissioner Monaghan is talking with respect to the delay or not.  Commissioner Hancock said that Mr. Michael Nix and Mrs. Denise Ogletree have said that it has been delayed. 

 

b.     Grants

Commissioner Monaghan asked if Mr. Tony Williamson has spoken to Mr. Steve Reeves.  Manager Coleman said he has talked to Mr. Reeves.  He said there are other grant areas that may not apply to Metro.  Manager Coleman said he heard that Metro would not qualify for any principle forgiveness through SRF.  Half of the money that Metro would borrow would not have any interest on it so the effective interest rate would be 1.84%.  Metro would not have any grant money through the $40 million from the government.  Manager Coleman has not received anything in writing.  Commissioner Monaghan said if Metro borrows the money at 1.84% they would not have to sell as many revenue bonds.  Manager Coleman said Metro could get the projects that have qualified and are ranked for an interest rate of 1.84%. 

 

c.      Seaboard Avenue Project

Commissioner Watts asked for a status update on the Seaboard Avenue Project.  Mr. Martin said the project should be ready to go to bid in two weeks.  Commissioner Monaghan wanted to make sure there would be a pre-bid meeting.  Mr. Martin said there would be. 

 

IX.          Miscellaneous Administrative Matter

a.      Report from Partnership

Commissioner Monaghan noted Mr. Mark Warner is out of town today and could not attend the meeting.  Commissioner Watts asked for an update on the City Pond Project.  Commissioner Monaghan said Mr. Reeves has been talking to Duke Energy about it.  It looks like Duke is very favorable; it is just a matter of time.  Commissioner Monaghan stated nothing is concrete.  Several different options are being explored. 

 

X.          Commissioner Monaghan made a motion to go into Executive Session to discuss a legal matter;

          Commissioner Hancock seconded, and the motion was unanimously approved. 

 

XI.          The meeting returned to open session.  No action was taken following the executive session.

 

XII.          With no further business, the meeting was adjourned.

 

 

Use Advanced Search