Main Menu

Home

GMD Commissioners

About Us

Customer Service

Education & Tours

Public Information

County Links

County GIS System

 

GMD Public Information

Public Menu2006 Minutes - 2007 Minutes - 2008 Minutes

Commission Minutes

GREENWOOD METROPOLITAN DISTRICT

MINUTES OF THE January 28, 2009

Regular meeting

 

The regular meeting of the Greenwood Metropolitan District Commission was held Wednesday, January 28, 2008 at 3:00 p.m., in the Conference Room of Greenwood Metropolitan District’s Technical Service Facility, 110 Metro Drive, Greenwood, SC 29646.

 

In attendance:

Commissioner Bob Haynie, Chairman             Richard Coleman        Marsha Meyer

Commissioner Byron Smith, Vice Chairman    Wayne Daniel             Michael Nix

Commissioner Gene Hancock, Secretary         Gayle Grogan              Danny Ware

Commissioner Michael G. Monaghan              Roy Hemphill              Mark Warner

Commissioner Henry Watts                             Paige Holley               Tony Williamson

Commissioner Tim Burke

 

 

I.          Chairman Haynie called the meeting to order and gave the statement of compliance with the notification provision

        of the Freedom of Information Act.

 

II.          Manager Coleman gave the invocation. 

 

III.        Chairman Haynie acknowledged a letter Metro received stating what a great and professional job done by the

         personnel in the Collections Department.

 

IV.          Wilson Creek Upgrade

Mr. Danny Ware of Davis and Floyd, Inc (D&F) distributed copies of the monthly report.  The monthly report will now be emailed to all Commissioners prior to the meeting.  Mr. Ware will only bring change order summary sheet and pictures to the Commission Meeting.  Mr. Ware provided progress updates on work that has been performed since the monthly construction meeting report.  The new end for the generator arrived and has been installed.  The contractor is in the process of testing the generator.  The generator shelter and main electrical building work is scheduled to start in the next few weeks.  The UV System is scheduled to start the second week in February.  SCDHEC EQC is coming next week to review the UV System.  The contractor is showing the overall construction to be a few months ahead of final completion.  BNR #1 and clarifier #4 are expected to start up in April.  The influent pump station will start-up before the start-up of BNR #1 and clarifier #4.  Commissioner Monaghan asked for an update on the leak at the influent pump station.  Mr. Ware said he is waiting to hear back from Chandler Construction on whether they are through with the work.  As soon as the repair is complete, the contractor will turn off the de-watering pumps and let the ground water build back up and observe the pump station for several weeks before the pump station is in operation.  Currently the influent pump station and grit removal are scheduled to be ready mid-March.  Commissioner Monaghan asked if the BNR #1 and clarifier #4 will be tested before final completion.  Mr. Ware said before the demolishing of the old plant, BNR#1 and clarifier #4 will be placed into operation.  The flow that would have gone to the trickling filters will now go to BNR#1.  Commissioner Monaghan asked if this would happen before the influent pump station is on-line.  Mr. Ware said the influent pump station would start in mid-March or the first of April, before the BNR #1 and clarifier #4 are on-line.  Mr. Ware presented two change orders for the Commission’s approval.  He explained each change order.  Currently the overall percentage change from change orders is 0.23% of the original contract value.  Mr. Ware described the construction photos.  Mr. Ware said he has received a text message from Ben Wofford from Design South stating Krah was working on retightening a few bolts around the flange on the influent pump station and will retest the pump station once that is finished.

 

Change Order #14

Adding low voltage panel in Main Electrical Building to serve the Generator Shelter.  Cost is $4,363.80.

 

Change Order #15

Change Grip Pump Disconnects to Explosion Proof.  Cost is $9,253.48.

 

Commissioner Hancock made a motion to approve Change Orders # 14 and #15; Commissioner Smith seconded, and the motion was unanimously approved. 

 

V.          TSF Expansion

Mrs. Meyer provided the expansion update since Mr. Bill Moore of D&F was unable to attend the meeting.  Mr. Meyer said at this point the contractor has mostly finishing work left.  In the past week the steps at the far end have been poured.  The contractor has installed the dividing wall in the Board/Training Room.  The air conditioning in the server room is expected to be installed later this week.  Mrs. Meyer and Mr. Greg McElhannon (need to check spelling) of D&F did a walk through today.  Both are concerned about the lack of man power.  D&F will address this issue with the contractor.  Metro is fairly satisfied with the work that has been done.  There are still some issues with the sheet rock and painting.  Mrs. Meyer reported the structure cabling project was finished this week.  The security, keyless entry and fire protection projects will be finished by the end of this week.  The completion date is March 17, 2008.  Furniture is scheduled to be delivered on March 18, 2008.  Metro has received a revised schedule from the contractor. 

 

VI.          Commissioner Monaghan made a motion to approve the December 17, 2008 minutes as amended;

           Commissioner Hancock seconded, and the motion was unanimously approved. 

 

VII.          Financial Report

a.      Manager Coleman said regarding the overall flow as mentioned in the management letter the flow is December, 2007 versus December, 2008.  The year-to-date numbers through December has one month of the decrease in the Solutia flow.  Manager Coleman said it is not uncommon for industrial flow to be down some during the Christmas Holiday.  Manager Coleman said Metro received a list from CPW that states the amount of money in arrears and Metro is working on that list.  Commissioner Monaghan asked if Manager Coleman had a chance to respond to the email he sent him.  Manager Coleman said Mrs. Grogan worked on it and she sent an email to him (Manager Coleman).  Manager Coleman will check to see if he forwarded the email to Commissioner Monaghan.  If not, he will send it.  Manager Coleman said the other part of the email was requesting a final budget book.  He said this year Metro did not make as many copies because some of the Commissioners have in past years told Metro they did not want one.  Manager Coleman said the summary sheet shows all of the changes that were made.  Commissioner Monaghan said he would like a copy of the final summary sheet.  Commissioner Monaghan asked for more explanations on the GASB 45 comment.  Manager Coleman said Metro has gone through the municipal association and their contact is Ms. Sharon McBride.  Milliman is the company that is doing the actuarial calculations.  Manager Coleman said this is “fine tuning” the estimate of $200,000 that was included in the budget.  Commissioner Monaghan said he thought there was some legislative relief on this issue.  Commissioner Hancock said there was relief.  Commissioner Burke said he thought it was a timing issue as to when GASB 45 was to be put in place.  Commissioner Monaghan said they (CPW) are not doing this.  Commissioner Burke and Chairman Haynie both said they thought the GASB 45 was delayed.  Commissioner Hancock said it is delayed but he does not know for how many years.  Commissioner Monaghan asked for a detailed explanation on the reimbursement from WEASC.  Manager Coleman said WEASC reimbursed Metro for the Operation Challenge Team trip to the finals.  WEASC policy is to reimburse the state winner for their travel and hotel expenses.  Commissioner Watts inquired about interest income – attachment A.  He said the actual amount for the year was $1,031,198 but the attachment has $1,030,434.  Commissioner Watts wanted to know which figure was correct.  Mrs. Grogan said the figure on page 12 $1,031,198 is correct.  Commissioner Monaghan said the before depreciation expenses is roughly $5,500 less than the year before.  He asked if Metro is estimating the rate increase correctly.  Commissioner Monaghan wanted to know the effective date of the rate increase.  Manager Coleman said the rate increase was effective January 1, 2009.  Commissioner Monaghan said that is a good performance without the rate increase.  Commissioner Monaghan referenced page 19 of the packets, he said in the millage account Metro will have $1,403,148.  Page 23 of the packets says Metro is going to pay out $762,000 (January – June).  Commissioner Monaghan said at the fiscal year end Metro will have $2,166,000 in the GO Account.  Commissioner Monaghan said per the debt service on page 24 is only $917,000.  He said if Metro was to subtract that, Metro is going to have $1,248,000 in the GO account that is not allocated.  Chairman Haynie said that is why the Commission has the Bond Resolution for reimbursement to consider at this meeting.  Commissioner Monaghan said in the January, 2008 minutes it states the Commission decided they wanted to issue a new GO Bond and it has been a year and no GO Bond has been issued.  Chairman Haynie said the County was going through a reassement and that is why Metro did not receive any figures until January 14, 2009.  Those numbers will determine the debt limit based on the 8% cap.  Chairman Haynie said that is why Metro has the resolution at today’s meeting so that Metro can levy up to $7 million.  Commissioner Monaghan said Metro has $1,248,000 and it probably will not be used for the debt service on the new bond.  Chairman Haynie said that money comes in yearly to pay the debt services.  Metro is trying to “clean” the account out by having an accelerated payment on the bond after issuance.  Commissioner Monaghan said he understands the strategy.  He wonders if there will be enough debt service off the new bond to take care of the $1,248,000 or will the County reduce the amount of taxes.  Chairman Haynie said Metro can only spend the money through paying the principle and interest on bonds.  Chairman Haynie said once Metro knows the amount of money they can borrow on the 8% debt limit; then Metro will have to back off an amount approximated to the balance in the account.  The first payment after the bond is issued will be an accelerated payment that will roughly equal to the balance in the account.  Manager Coleman said this is similar to what Metro did a few years ago.  Metro can designate how much principle is coming due each year.  Ordinarily the bonds are in $5,000 increments and the interest is on the balance and Metro would like for those two numbers to total close to the same number year after year.  Metro could for the first year add more for the principle payment.  Commissioner Burke asked if that would release Metro for more availability of indebtedness.  Chairman Haynie said Metro would not be able to use the full 8% because Metro wants to get the money out before the County changes their assessment.  .  Commissioner Burke said Metro would then go to $7 million and pay back $1.2 million roughly leaving $5.8 million.  Chairman Haynie said Metro is going to accelerate payment, not the principle.  Commissioner Burke said it will still leave Metro with a balance of $5.8 million.  Chairman Haynie said Metro cannot exceed the 8% limit.  He said Metro cannot borrow 8% plus the balance in the account.  Commissioner Watts inquired if Metro knows the assessed value.  Chairman Haynie said the value will be verified by the bond attorney.  Commissioner Hancock wanted to know what it would take for Metro to be able to use the money toward capital projects.  Mr. Hemphill said Metro’s enabling legislation has a hitch in it; it may take a state wide action before Metro can use the money for capital projects.  Chairman Haynie said to him it means Metro will always have to borrow money to do capital projects.  Mr. Hemphill said the last time it cost Metro $100,000 just to get access to the money.  Commissioner Monaghan wanted to know if Metro has an estimated cost of the Seaboard Project and the Hunters Creek Project.  He asked for that to be included in the next packet.  Manager Coleman said the Seaboard Project is in the design phase with $1.7 million as a planning level estimate costing Metro around $1.2 million plus the $500,000 grant.  The Hunter’s Creek Project is on hold.  Commissioner Monaghan asked if Manager Coleman could provide an estimate if the Commission went ahead with the project.  Manager Coleman said the estimate is included in the Long Range Plans that were updated 2007.  Commissioner Burke inquired about the project completion percentage for Lander University – Centennial Hall Project.  Manager Coleman said Metro is still waiting to receive the final invoice from Lander on this project.  Commissioner Watts inquired as to how long the Lander University Project will be on hold.  Manager Coleman said Metro is thinking the project is settled, but Metro does not have the hold harmless agreement from Lander in writing.  Commissioner Monaghan inquired if Metro has received any money from Kimbrook.  Manager Coleman said he is not aware of Metro receiving the money.  Mr. Daniel said Metro is finished with the needed repairs.  Commissioner Monaghan wanted to know what Metro is doing to collect the money.  Mr. Hemphill said it was set-up that Metro would invoice Kimbrook and they (Kimbrook) would turn the invoice over to the County for payment.  Commissioner Monaghan asked for staff to follow up on Kimbrook.

 

b.     Mr. Michael Nix of Greenwood Capital gave a report on the District’s portfolio.  The 1081 account represents the Reserve Account.  Mr. Nix pointed out that the first page shows which bonds have matured, called or sold during the fiscal year.  Page 2 of the report provides details of the portfolio to date.  Currently Metro has a mixture of treasury and agency securities in the account.  Page four is the performance report on the account as of December 31, 2008.  Mr. Nix directed the Commission to the next account which is the 1082 (Capacity) Account.  On page five it shows the bonds that have matured, called or sold during the fiscal year.  Commissioner Monaghan said his concern on this account is the withdrawals.  He said this account should be near zero amount balance because this should be used for capital projects.  Manager Coleman said the current policy that Metro uses states the Capacity Account will have a minimum balance of $500,000.  He said the Wilson Creek 48” line could be paid from this account.  Commissioner Monaghan said if Metro is going to ear mark the money it should be used for what it is ear marked for or Metro should not ear mark the money.  Manager Coleman said the Capacity Account is restricted.  Metro can only use the money for extensions or expansions of treatment plants and trunklines.  It can be used for upgrading the treatment plants.  Manager Coleman said the 1081 (revenue) Account is unrestricted.  Commissioner Monaghan said he does not want to get to the point where there is no room to use the money from the 1082 Account.  He said the $500,000 minimum is a Metro rule, not a legal rule.  Commissioner Hancock said this money is to replace the capacity that customers are using based on what is previously built.  Manager Coleman said Metro charges about one fifth of the true cost.  Commissioner Hancock asked if there is something in the legislation regarding Capacity Fees.  Mr. Hemphill said a lot of the restrictions that Manager Coleman has described regarding Capacity Fees are basically in the statute.  Commissioner Monaghan said currently the account has $3,700,000.  He does not want what happened to the GO Account to happen to the 1082 Account.  Chairman Haynie said this is Metro’s account and Metro controls how the money is spent.  Commissioner Burke said Metro has said some of this money is for the 48” Wilson Creek line that is not funded.  Manager Coleman said Metro needs to use the money from this account as the bonds mature as opposed to the other account.  He thinks Metro should properly time the liquidation of the account.  Mr. Nix said in the past Metro’s first priority is to use the Revenue Bond Proceed Account for any projects to avoid arbitrage.  Secondly, where Metro has taken money out of the Revenue Account it was on a short term basis with the money from the Revenue Bond Proceed Account.  Commissioner Monaghan asked if Metro can transfer money from one account to another account.  Manager Coleman said Metro cannot do that on the 1082 Account.  Mr. Hemphill said the 1082 Account is regulated by statutes.  Commissioner Monaghan said Metro uses money from the O&M Account and then in the Commission Meeting the Commissioners can make a motion to transfer money from the Reserve Account back to the O&M Account.  He wants to know why Metro could not do the same thing with the 1082 Account.  Mr. Hemphill said there are some specific statutes that dictate capacity fees and how they are handled.  Mr. Hemphill will check what Commissioner Monaghan is asking against the statute.  Commissioner Monaghan said if Metro keeps building the 1082 Account and not using anything out of it, pretty soon that account may be the only account Metro has left.  Commissioner Burke said it may be Metro’s reserve account.  Commissioner Monaghan said then Metro will not be able to use the money for other projects.  Commissioner Monaghan said if there is a project that applies to the 1082 Account, use the 1082 Account to pay for the project.  Commissioner Burke said draw down the 1082 Account prior to the Reserve Account.  Commissioner Monaghan said Manager Coleman is saying Metro will lose interest money by selling the bonds in the 1082 Account too early.  Manager Coleman said he will work on a plan to draw down the 1082 Account.  He is not sure how long that will take to draw the account down.  Chairman Haynie said Metro can only use the 1082 Account for trunk lines and treatment plants.  Commissioner Monaghan wanted to know why Metro cannot use the 1082 Account for collection lines.  Manager Coleman said his interpretation of the statute is the 1082 Account is used only for trunk lines and treatment plants not collection lines.  Mr. Hemphill said the Cost Recovery Policy is where Metro states the money can be used for trunk lines and treatment plants.  Mr. Hemphill said he will look at the statue in regards to collection lines.  According to the statute, Metro is to come up with a capital improvement plan.  Metro’s capital improvement plan is set forth in their policy.  Mr. Hemphill said the policy might be able to be amended.  Commissioner Monaghan said he thinks the policy was set pre-2000 before Metro maintained collection lines.  Manager Coleman said the Cost Recovery Policy was updated in 2003.  Mr. Nix said page six and seven have the holdings that are currently in the account.  Page eight has the performance report for the Capacity Account.  The 2008 Revenue Bond Proceeds (1893) Account starts on page 9 showing all items that have been called, sold or matured.  The account is designed to match the pay request schedule for the Wilson Creek Plant Upgrade.  Page 11 lists the current holdings in the account.  Page 12 has the performance report for this account.  Mr. Nix provided the Commission with some overall performance percentage for all accounts.  The 1081 Account was up 5.4% for calendar year 2008 and is up 3.56% for fiscal year-to-date.  The 1082 Account was up 5.81% for calendar year and is up 3.33% for fiscal year-to-date.  The 1893 Account is up 3.2% for calendar year and is up 2.07% for fiscal year-to-date.  Mr. Nix said the 1893 Account is an enhanced money market account.  He said overall they are pleased with the performance of that account given the current financial environment.  The 1081 and 1082 Accounts are in line with budget on the income generation and the 1893 Account is ahead of budget for the fiscal year.  Overall the financial environment is still difficult.  Greenwood Capital did receive the letter from Metro stating their instruction to not invest in Government Agencies.  Greenwood Capital did send a memo to the Commissioners via Manager Coleman in November/December talking about the new FDIC insured corporate bonds program.  Greenwood Capital’s evaluation is FDIC insured bonds do qualify under state statute.  Mr. Nix asked for a legal opinion before they proceed.  He said they are actively looking at South Carolina Municipal Bonds.  Currently the yields are higher on municipal bonds than treasury bonds.  Commissioner Monaghan asked if full federal backing means it is insured like a bank account.  Mr. Nix said yes, it is FDIC insurance.  Commissioner Monaghan inquired if there is a limit.  Mr. Nix replied not within this product.  Commissioner Monaghan asked if the government is willing to do that with corporate bonds why not Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac.  Mr. Nix responded that is a big question.  Currently they are trading right around where agencies are trading. 

 

VIII.          Action Items

a.      Resolution to County Council (see attachment A)

Manager Coleman said the purpose of this GO Bond is for the replacement of sewer trunk lines and an extension of sewer trunk lines and the upgrade to the Wilson Creek Plant.  Mr. Hemphill said the petition is so County Council can go through their proper steps.

 

Commissioner Monaghan made a motion to approve the resolution as submitted; Commission Watts seconded, and the motion was unanimously approved.

 

b.     Consideration of Bond Resolution for Reimbursement (see attachment B)

Chairman Haynie read the title of the resolution into the minutes: Confirming the intention of Greenwood Metropolitan District to be reimbursed for certain expenditures related to capital projects to be financed by the issuance of bonds. 

 

Commissioner Smith made a motion to approve the bond resolution for reimbursement as submitted; Commissioner Watts seconded, and the motion was unanimously approved.

 

c.      Consideration of Faith Home Response

Chairman Haynie said included in the packets is a letter from the Faith Home’s attorney approving the settlement on the right-of-way for $3,800.  Commissioner Monaghan said he did not understand why the Faith Home would need another sewer line.  Mr. Hemphill said the Faith Home has a pump station that pumps the effluent out the front entrance to the sewer line.  He said the new line Metro is installing is behind their facility so if they install a new sewer service line out the back it would gravity flow to Metro’s line.  Commissioner Burke noted the date on the letter from the attorney had 2008 instead of 2009.

 

Commissioner Hancock made a motion to settle the condemnation action on Faith Home by Metro paying $3,825 for the right-of-way; Commissioner Smith seconded, and the motion was unanimously approved. 

 

d.     Ratify Cured-in-place Emergency Line Repair

An email was sent to the Commissioners concerning a needed pipe repair utilizing cured-in-place pipe.  The amount of the repair was $35,227.50.  Reynolds Inliner made the repair.  Manager Coleman said to get the repair scheduled Metro had to make a commitment a week ago.  The repair has not been performed.

 

Commissioner Watts made a motion to ratify the cured-in-place emergency repair for $35,227.50; Commissioner Smith seconded, and the motion was unanimously approved.

 

e.      Consideration of creating an Accountant Position

Commissioner Monaghan presents his comments on this position to the Commissioners.  His comments are included as Attachment C.  Commissioner Monaghan read two paragraphs of his comments “We as the governing board are faced with an ever increasing responsibility to protect the assets of this agency and the citizens of the County that we serve.  Total assets at the FY 2008 year end were $158,370,973.  Of the total net assets, $21,516,648 was unrestricted and was available to support short-term operations.  As of June 30, 2008, the District had invested $101 million in capital assets.  Today’s meeting package shows that we are currently undertaking $39 million of capital projects and this year we will outlay another $258, 000 in capital items for our operations and maintenance budget proposals.  In addition, in Fiscal Year 2009, we are working with an $11 million operating and maintenance budget.  Today’s meeting package also details that we have $35 million in operating and bond funds and a total bond debt of $65 million. With this amount of money to control and watch over, I doubt there is any organization, public or private, that operates without an accountant to head its finance department.  In my view, we as the governing board have an obligation to protect our agency’s worth by hiring an accountant.  Commissioner Monaghan said we are in a world where every day we see on television financial abuse.  Commissioner Monaghan thinks it is his fiduciary responsibility and the other commissioners yours to make sure that Metro is protected in the financial area by an accountant.  Chairman Haynie said he does not disagree with what Commissioner Monaghan said but given the state of the economy he does not think it is the time for Metro to be adding another expense.  He noted that Metro has won the Comprehensive Accounting Award for several years and they are audited annually.  Chairman Haynie said this position might want to be revisited again during the budget process.  Commissioner Hancock said he agrees with Commissioner Monaghan that Metro could use an accountant, but he does not see the need to hire them at this time.  Commissioner Monaghan said if Metro is going to hire anybody now is the time to do it.  Commissioner Monaghan said it would be a terrible thing for Metro to have a financial issue and the Commissioners not vote to hire an accountant.  He said he thinks the Commissioners have a responsibility as the governing board to make sure Metro’s finances is adequately looked at; especially when you have the amount of money that Metro has.  Commissioner Burke said he has been the one that has complained the most about the spending, but he does not think it is responsible of Metro not to hire an accountant. 

 

Commissioner Monaghan made a motion for Metro to hire an accountant; Commissioner Burke seconded; and the motion did not pass for lack of majority vote.  Commissioners Smith, Hancock and Chairman Haynie opposed the motion. 

 

Commissioner Monaghan said based on Robert’s Rule of Order Commissioners Monaghan, Burke and Watts cannot make a motion to reconsider.  The motion can only be made by one of the Commissioners that opposed the original motion.  Chairman Haynie said as a matter of the budget this issue can be reconsidered. 

 

IX.          Miscellaneous Administrative Matters

a.      Information on agreement with CPW to discontinue water service for failure to pay GMD charges

Chairman Haynie said from his understanding this is an amendment to the current policy.  Mr. Hemphill said Mr. Martin had asked him to gather information on proposing a written agreement between CPW and Metro.  CPW is the collecting agency for Metro.  Mr. Hemphill said to his knowledge there is no written agreement that states what that agency is supposed to do.  Metro does pay a per bill charge to CPW for their service.  Mr. Hemphill said there is no written agreement in terms of defining what CPW does as a part of the collection process.  Mr. Hemphill said by the time the packets were delivered he had a page of information ready (page 39 in Jan. 28th packet).  Commissioner Hancock inquired if Mr. Hemphill found anything that states as long as a CPW customer is paying their bill they cannot be disconnected from services.  Mr. Hemphill said there are statutes that allow for the water agency to do that.  The body of the agreement was not ready before the delivery of the packets.  Mr. Martin included a disconnection procedure.  Mr. Hemphill said he does not think those two items go together.  One is the agreement that needs to add language that will say GMD and CPW agree to the following items.  The information from Mr. Martin is further definition to the resolution that the Commission adopted on November 12, 2008 in response to the delinquent accounts in the Lakeshores Area.  Mr. Hemphill is asking the Commission to allow more time on this so that he and Mr. Martin can get together and discuss this issue in detail.  Manager Coleman said Metro will also need to coordinate with CPW; Metro wanted to get some input from the Commissioners.  Manager Coleman said one important item that is not included is “will CPW cut off a water meter for non-payment of the sewer charges.”  Commissioner Watts inquired if Mr. Hemphill has spoken to CPW’s attorney on this issue.  Mr. Hemphill responded he has not.  He wanted to pull a draft together for discussion purposes first.  Commissioner Monaghan asked if Mr. Hemphill and Mr. Bill Patrick (CPW’s attorney) will meet to discuss this agreement.  Mr. Hemphill said he will meet with Mr. Patrick to discuss this agreement.  Commissioner Hancock said CPW will cut off services for non-payment of gas and electric.  Commissioner Burke noted those are all services that CPW provides.  Manager Coleman said CPW and Metro are two different entities and the sewer charge goes out on a CPW bill.  He said the question is “if a sewer charge (capacity fee, sewer service, transmission fee, tap fee) that is billed by CPW and goes unpaid, will CPW cut off the water meter.”  Commissioner Monaghan wanted to know logistically how that would work because it is all on the same bill.  Commissioner Burke said the bill is broken out.  Commissioner Monaghan said the bill is broken out, but if the customer is late than they are late on everything.  Chairman Haynie asked if CPW does accept partial payment.  All of the CPW Commissioners said yes.  Chairman Haynie said then it could be.  Commissioner Burke asked who does the partial payment go to.  Commissioner Hancock said the distribution of payment is in-line (Gas, Electric, Water then Sewer).  He said what utility is not paid one month is the first utility to be paid the next month.  Commissioner Monaghan said CPW only cuts the meter off when there is no payments.  Chairman Haynie asked if a customer could come in and say they only wanted to pay their gas, water and electric portion of their bill would CPW accept payment.  Commissioner Watts said the cashier will take the money and apply it to their bill.  Manager Coleman said if the total charges for gas, water and electric is $100 and the sewer charge is $20; the customer comes in and pays $100 it goes to the gas, water and electric and sewer does not get paid.  Commissioner Watts said the sewer will get paid first the next month.  Commissioner Monaghan said if the customer does not pay then CPW cuts off the services.  He said that is why he does not see the logistics of why this agreement is necessary.  Manager Coleman said Metro currently has a situation where the Capacity Fee has not been paid and it was billed on the CPW bill.  Commissioner Monaghan said that is different.  Manager Coleman said the customer has had water while under construction but the Capacity Fee has not been paid and it is time to cut on the sewer and Metro has not received payment yet.  Commissioner Monaghan asked if that shows up as a delinquent account and if it does not then why.  *** (First tape ends.  I had to leave to find a new tape.  Part of this discussion was not recorded). ***  Commissioner Burke suggested the reconnection charge for residential customers and a separate charge for commercial and industrial customers. 

 

X.          Old/Other Business

a.      Lander University

Commissioner Burke asked Mr. Ware to speak to Mr. Moore concerning the status of the hold harmless agreement with Lander University on Centennial Hall.

 

b.     Minutes

Commissioner Monaghan asked for Mr. Ken Davis to show Mrs. Holley how to add the minutes from the commission meetings to the website. 

 

c.      Grants

Commissioner Monaghan said if the Metro staff did not want to work with Mr. Richard Gentry (CPW) on public relations and grants; he wants to know what plan Metro has to cover these needs.  Manager Coleman said Mr. Tony Williamson is handling Metro efforts to obtain grants.  Mr. Williamson said Metro has been working hard with South Carolina’s US Senators to make sure the projects Metro has ready are getting on the lists to possibly receive federal and/or state funding.  He is also working with the Upper Savannah Council of Governments to help develop a state list of projects.  This list is similar to what the US Government has.  The schedule for the CDBG Grants has just been published.  Metro is working on developing a project that would start where the Seaboard Project Grant stops to expand to other LMI situations there.  Mr. Williamson is writing a federal apportions for the Panola Village.  Mr. Williamson reminded the Commissioners of a web cast regarding the economic stimulus money on February 2nd at 2:00 pm.  Metro will be talking with some representatives from EPA to get an idea of what types of projects will be available and of the application process.  Chairman Haynie asked for an email to be sent to all Commissioners reminding them of this event.  Commissioner Monaghan asked about the grant the County if seeking around the lake.  Manager Coleman said Metro worked with the County for Lakeshores Drive and on a grant for a potential industrial site.  Commissioner Monaghan reminded Mr. Williamson there are three quadrants on Shrine Club Road that Metro was going to look for grants. 

 

d.     Eagles Harbor

Commissioner Monaghan inquired if Metro has heard any more about the Eagles Harbor Subdivision.  Manager Coleman said there is no new information to report. 

 

e.      Farm

Commissioner Monaghan inquired about the removal of the silo at the Farm.  Chairman Haynie said he thought Mr. Martin was working on it.

 

f.       Turner Branch Phase II

Commissioner Monaghan wanted to know the status of the Turner Branch Phase II Project.  Manager Coleman said Metro has not started the design of it, but they know it is the next phase of the Turner Branch Project. 

 

XI.          Commissioner Monaghan made a motion to go into Executive Session to discuss a legal matter, a contractual matter

           and a personnel matter; Commissioner Hancock seconded, and the motion was unanimously approved. 

 

XII.          The meeting returned to open session.  No action was taken following the executive session.

 

XIII.          With no further business, the meeting was adjourned.


 


 


 


 

 

Comments on hiring an accountant to head GMD’s Financial Department.

Michael Monaghan

January 28, 2009

 

 

            Effective January 1, 2000, GMD took over the sewer line operation and maintenance previously performed by CPW.  In addition, several county subdivisions were incorporated into the collection line service and maintenance agreements. 

 

            Since that date, our agency has continued to grow with more service areas and responsibilities.  We began our journey working out of a double wide mobile home and now we will in March; move all our administration offices and expanding support operations into this newly constructed building. 

 

            As part of this move, we need to review our staff responsibilities and organization structure.  Therefore; I think it appropriate for us to consider adding an accountant to head our financial department and have the individual in place at the time of this move.

 

            I do not mean any of these remarks to be a reflection of the job both Richard and Gayle have done in regard to our financial accounting.  This agency has been awarded a Certificate of Achievement for excellence in financial reporting for four years in a row and our most recent audit has been submitted by Elliot Davis for the fiscal year 2008 award.

 

            However, our General Manager’s function is to manage the agency and not to be its Chief Financial Officer.  Further, Elliot Davis financial audit does not include auditing our operating procedures or our compliance to them.  Nor does the Elliot Davis audit provide an opinion on the internal control over financial reporting or compliance.

 

            Standard and prudent business practice dictates that there are distinct divisions between certain operations within an organization.  For example: receiving should never report to purchasing, or accounts payable should never be function of purchasing.  So it goes that the financial department should be separate and unique from operations.  Although the financial department may in some organizations report to the General Manager, there is at least a dotted line to the governing board and an explicit understanding that it has an obligation to report all irregularities to the Board.

 

            The Board should be able to have confidence that any irregularity that takes place would be promptly identified and reported to the Board by an employee whose primary duty is to watch over the financial interest of the agency.  The input of accurate and well studied analysis of our financial situation is essential for the Board to fulfill its responsibilities.  Proper understanding and analysis of our financial situation dramatically affect our Board’s decisions regarding customer rate increases. 

 

            We as the governing board are faced with an ever increasing responsibility to protect the assets of this agency and the citizens of the County that we serve.  Total assets at the FY 2008 year end were $158,370,973.  Of the total net assets, $21,516,648 was unrestricted and was available to support short-term operations.  As of June 30, 2008, the District had invested $101 million in capital assets.  Today’s meeting package shows that we are currently undertaking $39 million of capital projects and this year we will outlay another $258, 000 in capital items for our operations and maintenance budget proposals.  In addition, in Fiscal Year 2009, we are working with an $11 million operating and maintenance budget.  Today’s meeting package also details that we have $35 million in operating and bond funds and a total bond debt of $65 million.

 

            With this amount of money to control and watch over, I doubt there is any organization, public or private, that operates without an accountant to head its finance department.  In my view, we as the governing board have an obligation to protect our agency’s worth by hiring an accountant. 

 

 

 

 

Use Advanced Search