Main Menu

Home

GMD Commissioners

About Us

Customer Service

Education & Tours

Public Information

County Links

County GIS System

 

GMD Public Information

Public Menu2006 Minutes - 2007 Minutes

Commission Minutes

GREENWOOD METROPOLITAN DISTRICT

MINUTES OF THE October 10, 2007

Regular meeting

 

The regular meeting of the Greenwood Metropolitan District Commission was held Wednesday, October 10, 2007 at 3:00 p.m., in the Training Room of Greenwood Metropolitan District Technical Service Facility, 110 Metro Drive.

 

In attendance:

Commissioner Bob Haynie, Chairman               Richard Coleman          Paige Holley

Commissioner Byron Smith, Vice Chairman      George Martin              Marsha Meyer

Commissioner Gene Hancock, Secretary          Marion Boone              Jamie Peeler

Commissioner Michael G. Monaghan                Daniel Clark                 Steve Pohlman

Commissioner Henry Watts                              Wayne Daniel               Brian Waldrep

Commissioner Tim Burke                                  Roy Hemphill

 

I.        Chairman Haynie called the meeting to order and Mr. Martin gave the invocation.

 

II.     Chairman Haynie gave the statement of compliance with the notification provision of the Freedom of Information Act.

 

III.   Commissioner Monaghan made a motion that the minutes from the September 12, 2007 Regular Meeting be approved as mailed and Commissioner Hancock seconded.  The motion was unanimously approved.

 

IV.  Financial Report

Manager Coleman said the rates and bond will be discussed under the financial plan part of the meeting.  Commissioner Watts inquired if the sewerage income increased.  Manager Coleman responded there is no new information since the last meeting.  Commissioner Monaghan pointed out that according to the last financial statement the sewer revenue is about the same as last year.  He said there is around $60,000 difference.  Manager Coleman noted Metro had a rate change since last August.  Commissioner Monaghan said Metro had $1,628,038 this August, and last August Metro had $1,687,417.  Manager Coleman said Metro should be 8% ahead of last year to be equal with last year’s amount.  Commissioner Monaghan noted that spending is down this year so Metro should be alright.  Commissioner Monaghan said as he sees it the revenue is about the same as last year and the spending is down compared to last year.  Manager Coleman said Metro is trying to increase the rates so they can take on the new debt from the new bond.  He said being the same is not good; Metro should be ahead.  Chairman Haynie said Metro is supposed to be 8% ahead from last year.  Commissioner Monaghan said he knows, but if Metro’s spending is down why would they need to be 8% ahead.  Manager Coleman said the net between the two is not as big as it should have been.  Commissioner Monaghan said it is not an overwhelming crisis.  Chairman Haynie and Manager Coleman both stated it is something that Metro needs to watch.  Commissioner Watts inquired where were monies recorded for a pretreatment violation.  Manager Coleman responded they are recorded in other income. 

 

V.     Service Reports

a.       Collection System

Commissioner Monaghan referenced page 15, a service call for Country Homes, which had a service line Sanitary Sewer Overflow (SSO).  Mr. Daniel said the customer’s service line was stopped up before the connection to Metro’s line.  Metro makes a notation of all overflows no matter who is responsible.  Chairman Haynie noted the low pressure system maintenance cost seems to be getting better.  Mr. Daniel responded from what he understood from the last meeting Metro is to record the start-up cost separately.  Metro has spent $41,000 from June 2006 to December 2006 identifying and location of system components.  Commissioner Monaghan commented the operations and maintenance cost look very good.  Mr. Daniel said he will continue to keep track of all expenses.  Commissioner Watts asked why the collections amount is an odd number when the billing amount is always an even number.  Manager Coleman explained how the payments are distributed.  Commissioner Monaghan inquired if the grinder pump fee rate was increased by 8% under the proposed rates.  Manager Coleman replied the grinder pump fee rate was not included as a part of the rate study.

 

b.      Engineering

Chairman Haynie noted there were a lot of violations.  Mr. Waldrep said none of the violations were considered major violations.  The new permits are in effect and the monthly averages are lower than they have been.  Metro does not expect any of the industries to be a repeat violator. 

 

c.       I/I Abatement

Commissioner Monaghan asked for more detail on the report.  He would like to know who is paying for each project, a description of each project, and who are the sub-contractors for each project.  Commissioner Monaghan asked if the grant money that was left over from another project could be used for the electrical problems on the LMI Grant Project.  Mr. Martin said Metro did have money left over on the Oregon Street Grant Project, but the money was given to the Oregon Street Streetscape Project.  Metro was not allowed to transfer the money towards the LMI Grant Project.  Mr. Martin said all of the electrical issues will be included in the grant monies.  Mr. Boone said some of the electrical boxes will need to be upgraded in order for the pumps to be connected.  The grant has a maximum of $500,000 and any overages will be at Metro’s expense.  The electrical box upgrade is handled through the grant and it is not at Metro’s directive.  Commissioner Monaghan asked for more information of the smoke test performed at Lander University.  Mr. Boone replied Metro had to abandon old lines at Lander University that connected to the Cambridge Avenue Project.  Metro performed a smoke test at Lander to ensure all roof leaders (gutters) were abandon.  Metro determined the roof leaders were not connected.  If the roof leader had been connected, Metro would have asked Lander to remove them.  Commissioner Monaghan inquired if the roof leaders were connected to the sewer system before they were abandoned.  Mr. Boone replied in this instance they were not connected. 

 

d.      Maintenance

Mr. Clark informed the Board that all Omni sites had been installed at each pump station.

 

e.       West Alexander

Chairman Haynie asked for clarification on the letter from DHEC regarding the macroinvertebrate stream assessment sites being impaired.  Mr. Peeler responded that was an internal letter from DHEC.  The letter was saying the stream is considered impaired by DHEC.  Commissioner Monaghan asked for Mr. Peeler to define “impaired”.  Mr. Peeler said the invertebrate life is comprised in the stream.  Basically there are not a lot of “creatures” in the stream above or below the West Alexander discharge point.  Mr. Peeler said DHEC will not say this was not caused by Metro and that Metro does not need to do this test.  Mr. Peeler stated that the macroinvertebrate assessment tells DHEC nothing.  Commissioner Monaghan asked for a definition of invertebrate.  Mr. Peeler said any organism that does not have a spine (i.e. crawfish, dragonfly, bugs, nymphs, lava, etc.).  DHEC has to do the assessment in eight man hours.  Normally DHEC will bring multiple people and space them throughout the stream.  The people will look for the invertebrates and collect samples.  After the collection, DHEC classifies the invertebrates according to how high the existing form of life is in the stream.  Different forms of life determine the health of the stream. 

 

f.        Wilson Creek

No questions were asked concerning this department. 

 

g.       General Service Report Information

The Commission congratulated the Operations Challenge Team for finishing fourth in the New Jersey Operations Challenge Event.  Commissioner Watts inquired on the status of the expansion to the Technical Services Facility (TSF) Building.  Mr. Martin said Metro is to receive the drawing November 1st.  Commissioner Hancock said he has talked with Davis and Floyd and they are to expedite the plans. 

 

VI.  Action Items

a.       Consideration of Contract for City Pond Project

Commissioner Monaghan said it seemed like emphasis for the pipe size was based on the potential of the City Pond area, but the long range plan extends that line to other areas.  He asked if the preliminary engineering report included future expansion.  Mr. Martin said it is accounted for in the report.  Commissioner Monaghan asked if Metro was pleased with the recommendations.  Mr. Martin responded yes Metro is pleased.  Commissioner Monaghan said we had a proposal for 1,000 homes in that area.  Mr. Martin said an 8” line could serve 1,000 homes.  Commissioner Monaghan commented normally the Board does not receive a Preliminary Engineering Report (PER).  Mr. Martin said that was correct, but for this particular case Metro required a PER.  Commissioner Monaghan asked if Metro was pleased with the PER.  Mr. Martin responded they are very pleased.  Mr. Martin said Metro will need to have Mr. Hemphill’s comments on the contract and to have the Board’s approval of the contract based on Mr. Hemphill’s recommendations.  Commissioner Monaghan commented the proposed contract is in the engineer’s favor.  Mr. Hemphill said it was not in the engineer’s favor anymore than he would expect.  Mr. Hemphill referenced page 5 or 8, paragraph B, as a limitation of liability paragraph that should be removed. 

 

Commissioner Watts made a motion to award the design contract for the City Pond Project subject to the changes on the limitation of liability; Commissioner Hancock seconded, and the motion was unanimously approved. 

 

VII.      Miscellaneous Administrative Matters

a.       Report from the Partnership

Commissioner Monaghan reported that he and Chairman Haynie are on the finance committee.  Commissioner Monaghan no longer signs the checks, but he still reviews the checks.  Commissioner Monaghan said he does not feel comfortable with the Executive Director signing checks over a certain amount of money.  Chairman Haynie said there are a lot of positive projects to come. 

 

b.      Commissioner Monaghan inquired if Metro has spoken with Mr. Timms.  Mr. Martin replied no.  Commissioner Monaghan noted Mr. Timms is building more buildings. 

 

c.       Commissioner Monaghan asked if the Board is going to be present at any of the meetings with CDM and Davis and Floyd.  Manager Coleman said there has only been one meeting and it was for the first part; the rest has been written communication between the two.  Manager Coleman forwarded information to the Board last week from CDM and Davis and Floyd.  Commissioner Monaghan asked for Manager Coleman to resend him the information.  Mr. Martin made copies of the email for the Board. 

 

d.      Commissioner Monaghan inquired on the status of the trailers.  Manager Coleman said Metro was instructed to talk to the Legislation Delegation.  Commissioner Monaghan said they had asked CPW to provide Metro with a bill of sale.  Commissioner Burke stated the bill of sale is not the problem; it is the Certificate of Origin.  Mr. Martin said he spoke to Senator O’Dell and he said if it is the law, Metro has to follow the law.  Commissioner Hancock stated one trailer originated at CPW and the others at Chandler.  Mr. Martin said there was never a bill of sale because it was included in the construction projects.  Commissioner Hancock said they can make a bill of sale.  He said the origin would be Chandler and CPW.  Manager Coleman said the origin is the manufacturer.  Commissioner Watts inquired if the trailers had a VIN number.  Mrs. Holley replied Metro has the VIN numbers and serial numbers for the trailers, but they do not have the Certificate Of Origin.  Commissioner Burke said the trailers cannot be registered without the Certificate Of Origin.  Commissioner Watts asked if the Certificate Of Origin is the company that made the trailer.  Mr. Martin said the Highway Department is saying without the Certificate Of Origin there is no way to prove the trailers were not stolen.  Commissioner Monaghan asked to have a copy of a Certificate Of Origin emailed to the Board.  Commissioner Burke said it is the weight of the trailer.  Mr. Martin said if Metro was to purchase the used trailers, Metro could still utilize parts from the old trailers.  Commissioner Burke said for boat trailers the Certificate Of Origin has the VIN number and the manufacturer.  Commissioner Monaghan inquired why can’t Metro make up a Certificate Of Origin.  Mr. Hemphill said Metro needs to make sure the VIN number is listed on the insurance policy.  Manager Coleman said Metro has them listed on the insurance policy.  Commissioner Monaghan asked for staff to see if there is something else that can be done to help acquire a tag for the trailers.  Mr. Martin said staff has tried everything they know to do.  Metro has been working on this for a long time.  Commissioner Burke asked if Chandler was not working with Metro on this.  Manager Coleman said Chandler does not keep records past 5 years.  Commissioner Monaghan said the purchasing agent for Chandler may remember where they bought the trailers.  Commissioner Burke asked if Chandler could issue an Affidavit Of Ownership.  Mr. Hemphill said an Affidavit Of Purchase.  Commissioner Burke said an Affidavit Of Purchase from Chandler saying they purchased the trailer from X manufacturer and gave the trailer to Metro.  Mr. Martin said staff will look into the Affidavit Of Purchase. 

 

e.       Commissioner Monaghan inquired about the monthly distribution cost for biosolids.  Mr. Martin said Mr. Peeler handed out a scoring system on how Metro determines what property will receive the biosolids.  Mr. Martin said Mr. Peeler had the information, but it was not asked about in the service reports.  Commissioner Monaghan asked for the information to be presented at the next meeting.  Manager Coleman said he believes the cost was $38.28 per ton.  Chairman Haynie asked if this was only the transporting cost.  Manager Coleman said it was the total cost.  Metro has a processing cost for chemicals, power, hauling and spreading.  Commissioner Monaghan said distribution to him is hauling and spreading only.  Manager Coleman said Metro was comparing that cost to the Landfill cost.  The landfill is a tipping fee and Metro has to prepare the biosolids; Metro only eliminates the spreading cost when using the landfill.  Manager Coleman said the distribution cost will be emailed to the Board.  Mr. Martin said Mr. Daniel provided them with the hauling cost.  Manager Coleman said Mr. Peeler did offer him a copy of the information, but he asked Mr. Peeler to give him a copy when he (Mr. Peeler) gave the Board the information.  Commissioner Hancock asked staff to find out what Ninety Six is going to do with the land application of biosolids.  Manager Coleman said Metro looked into this when the West Alexander upgrade was planned.  At that time Metro needed 1100 acres to apply on; that is not including the buffer and places where Metro could not apply.  Commissioner Burke said Ninety Six is using that in hopes to receive supplemental discharge capacity.  The discharge stream cannot accept anymore so that would be supplemental to the stream for gray water discharge. 

 

f.        Commissioner Monaghan inquired if Metro was going to discuss the Long Range Capital Plan.  Mr. Martin said that item will need a separate meeting.

 

g.       Commissioner Burke inquired about the problem at Folly Bend.  Mr. Martin explained the situation.  Metro received a call Monday that the sewer line was overflowing.  Upon arriving Metro found the sewer line was full of red mud.  Metro relieved the stoppage which took about 1 ˝ days.  After some investigation Metro found out there is a manhole going down the hill that either had a stub-out not capped or the manhole had a plug in it.  The water from the storm detention pond came down and made a hole right near the manhole.  All of the water was entering the hole following the gravel in the sewer line.  The water made its way into the sewer line through the open stub-out.  Commissioner Burke asked whose line is it.  Mr. Martin replied the line belongs to Metro.  Chairman Haynie asked who was the developer.  Mr. Martin responded Howard Corley.  Mr. Corley is going back and forth between Mr. Chandler and Mr. Anderson.  Mr. Anderson did the pond; Mr. Chandler installed the sewer lines.  Commissioner Monaghan asked who paid to have the sewer line installed.  Mr. Martin responded Mr. Corley paid to have the lines installed.  Mr. Corley hired Mr. Chandler and Mr. Anderson, Metro did not hire them.  Commissioner Monaghan asked how did the red mud get into the sewer lines.  Mr. Martin said the mud is just slurry in the water.  Commissioner Burke asked if the lines belong to Metro, and how can Metro ask Mr. Corley to pay for cleaning the line.  Mr. Martin said the stub-out was not properly capped.  Commissioner Monaghan asked who owns the stub-out.  Mr. Martin replied Metro owns them.  Commissioner Watts inquired if Metro had taken care of the open stub-out.  Mr. Martin responded yes the stub-out is now properly capped.  Chairman Haynie said Chandler installed the lines and turned the lines over to Metro, but did not properly cap the stub-out.  Manager Coleman said Metro accepted the lines and Metro inspected the lines.  Commissioner Monaghan said he thinks Metro may have to absorb the cleaning cost.  Commissioner Monaghan asked what other issues had the problem caused.  Mr. Martin asked who is responsible for the problem.  He said there will be some major money spent to fix the issue.  Commissioner Burke asked if there is a rain event in excess of a few inches, will the line overflow again.  Mr. Martin replied no, Metro has properly plugged the stub-out.  Manager Coleman said it sounds like there is enough velocity to carry the water and dirt until it reaches the flatter line, then the dirt settles in the line.  Mr. Martin said the line goes straight down hill toward the golf course.  Mr. Martin has spoken with Mr. Corley regarding this; somebody will need to fix it permanently when they fix the hole.  Commissioner Hancock said the sewer line will also need to be fixed.  Mr. Martin said yes.  Commissioner Hancock asked if Metro has accepted that line.  Mr. Martin responded Metro has accepted all of the lines.  Mr. Martin reminded the Board of the past issues with Folly Bend concerning rights-of-way.  Metro informed the Board at that time about the rights-of-way being encroached upon with power lines and gas lines.  The Board responded that Metro should call Palmetto Utility Protection Service before they dug.  Metro cannot get to some of the houses because fences have been installed; the sewer line goes in between the houses.  The homeowners built a wooden fence to keep from seeing the retention pond.  This is why Metro brings the issue to the Board before a house is built.  Commissioner Hancock said the pond and rain is what caused this problem.  Mr. Martin said the original design was the retention pond would send water through a wooded area.  At some time somebody came up and turned the water across the sewer rights-of-way; had the water not been turned to go across the right-of-way this problem would not have happened.  Mr. Martin said Metro has TVed the sewer line and the line is intact.  Commissioner Burke asked if anything else needs to be done to the sewer line.  Mr. Martin said the stub-out still needs to be capped.  Commissioner Burke inquired who is responsible for capping the stub-out.  Mr. Martin replied he thinks Folly Bend should cap the line.  Metro has a plug in the line so nothing can get in.  Commissioner Burke said he thinks a misunderstanding has occurred and more work may need to be done on the sewer line.  Commissioner Burke asked if anybody else can do work on the sewer line after Metro has accepted the line.  Mr. Martin said people can do work as long as they have Metro’s permission.  Commissioner Hancock inquired if the sewer line needed to be repaired.  Mr. Martin said Metro has TVed the line and the line is still on grade.  Metro does know if the gravel bedding has been washed out from under the pipe.  Commissioner Hancock stated Metro does not know how long the sewer line will stay on grade.  Commissioner Smith wanted to know how long the sewer plug will hold.  Mr. Martin said Metro has secured the plug.  Chairman Haynie asked if somebody is going to have to dig the line up to fix the bedding.  Mr. Martin said nobody knows until the ground is opened up.  Commissioner Burke asked if Metro has already accepted the line and the one year warranty has expired, and how can Metro make the contractor go back and fix the line once Metro accepted it.  Mr. Martin responded he believes the storm drain lines and detention pond caused the problem.  Manager Coleman said it sounds as though the storm drains were not installed according to the plans.  Commissioner Burke stated the detention pond damaged the sewer line.  Mr. Martin agreed with that statement.  Commissioner Hancock noted that needs to be corrected.  He said the contractor had the storm drain lines where they would flow out into the woods.  Mr. Martin said it was piped and there was a natural drainage ditch right by a creek.  He said it was put in right originally.  Mr. Martin said somebody changed it to go across the right-of-way. 

 

h.       Mr. Martin reported he received a call from Mr. Sam Leman.  Mr. Leman would like for Metro to provide an Environmental Information Document (EID) in order for the County to recoup some of the funds they invested into the Lake Shores Phase 2 Project.  This would cost Metro $3,000 to $5,000.  Commissioner Monaghan asked if the County will pay for this.  Mr. Martin replied the County wants Metro to pay for it.  Chairman Haynie said if the County wants to reimburse Metro for the cost to provide the document then he sees no reason why Metro cannot provide the document.  Manager Coleman said the County agreed to pay Metro $900,000 over time ($72,000 a year); this is the money the County is trying to get back.  Chairman Haynie suggested for the County to contract with Mr. Frazier to provide the information. 

 

i.         Mr. Martin handed out a letter Metro received from Edgefield County Water and Sewer Commission.  The letter thanked Metro for helping them with a sewer problem.

 

j.        Commissioner Hancock reminded the Board of the meeting regarding Eagles Harbor.  He said the County requested the meeting.  Commissioner Monaghan said when the County requests Metro’s presence at a meeting; the County Manager should contact Metro’s Manager.  Commissioner Hancock said he took the request as for Metro’s Commissioners not CPW’s Commissioners.  Commissioner Watts said they asked CPW to attend.  Manager Coleman said he thought the request came from a County Council member.  He reminded the Board of the meeting with DHEC in July and they were to have a follow-up meeting in two or three weeks.  Manager Coleman believes this is the follow-up meeting.  Chairman Haynie asked for Manager Coleman to give a report to the Commissioners that cannot attend the meeting.  Chairman Haynie reminded the Board that Eagles Harbor is not in Metro’s District.  Commissioner Burke asked if Metro has any information on the Homeowner Association suing DHEC and DHEC’s insurance company’s willingness to pay for some of this.  Commissioner Hancock said DHEC told Eagles Harbor that all of the lots would perk, but not all of them will.  Commissioner Hancock wanted to know what DHEC said when Manager Coleman met with them last July.  Manager Coleman said DHEC right now will not commit to anything other than they know the legislation has appropriated $990,000 for the problem.  DHEC is looking to the Homeowners Association to install the collection system.  Metro is talking about having to install a pump station in the Virgin Heights area with an estimated cost of $850,000.  Metro will not take any action until Eagles Harbor annexes into the District and shows Metro how they are going to connect to the pump station at Highway 254 and Highway 246.  Commissioner Hancock asked if Eagles Harbor will install a collection system and pump the wastewater back to the pump station.  Manager Coleman replied it will be a grinder pump system with a force main to a pump station at their entrance.  He said he thought it may take two more pump stations to get to the Metro pump station. 

 

k.      Manager Coleman informed the Board that Metro had a meeting yesterday with the attorney, bond attorney and the financial advisor regarding the bond issue.  The rating for the bond is scheduled for November 13th or 14th.  Metro is looking at financing this project with bonds approximately $30 million instead of $20 million and it looks like the same rate structure will work.  There may be a problem with the first year, but the financial advisor was going back to look at this.  Metro had anticipated having the cost of the project known and that has been pushed back to December 5th.  The topic of the discussion yesterday was whether or not to price the bonds after Metro knows the price of the project.  Metro will probably price the bonds around January 9th and receive the money around January 23rd.  Metro would not be spending the money until February.  Commissioner Monaghan asked if this would be for all phases or just Phase 1B.  Manager Coleman responded it will be for Phase 1B only.  Commissioner Monaghan said he did not understand.  Manager Coleman said the Long Range Plan was set up to obtain bonds every 2 years; $20 million this year, two years later $15 million and two years after that $10 million.  Commissioner Monaghan said Phase 1A was $8.2 million and now Metro is saying they are going for $30 million; that is almost $40 million.  He thought the whole project cost including all phases was around $40 million.  Manager Coleman said the whole project was around $46 million.  Commissioner Monaghan inquired on why Metro needed $30 million for phase 1B.  Manager Coleman replied that is the anticipated cost amount for phase 1B.  Commissioner Monaghan stated the cost for Phase 1A and Phase 1B is almost the entire projected cost of the project.  Commissioner Watts asked if Phase 1B is the biggest phase.  Manager Coleman said Phase 1B is the biggest phase; the equalization basins cost on average $5 million and the last BNR will cost around $5 million.  Commissioner Monaghan said Phase 1A cost $8.2 million, Phase 1B is $30 million so what is the cost for the other phases.  Manager Coleman said both Phase 2 and 3 are anticipated to cost $5 million each.  Commissioner Monaghan asked how much was anticipated for the cost after phase 1B.  Commissioner Watts responded $8 to $10 million.  Commissioner Monaghan said Metro is now talking a total cost of $48 million.  Manager Coleman replied yes, but $2.2 million was from Phase 1A.  The estimates have been revised but they may need to be revised again after Metro receives the bids for Phase 1B.  Commissioner Hancock inquired about the capacity upgrade.  Manager Coleman said after the final phase Wilson Creek will still be an 18 million gallon a day (MGD) plant.  He noted after Phase 1B Wilson Creek will still be a 12 MGD plant.  Commissioner Monaghan asked if the 6 foot pipe is included in the cost.  Mr. Martin said that cost is not included.  Commissioner Hancock inquired on what Metro needs to do to the permit to become a 20 MGD plant.  Manager Coleman said Wilson Creek will become an 18 MGD plant after Phase 3 in 2017. 

 

l.         Advertisement for Rate Increase

Manager Coleman said the Board needs to decide on what rate structure they want to advertise in the newspaper.  Either rate structure has to be 8% more money.  Manager Coleman asked if the Board wants to hold the meter charge the same and go up on the volumetric charge anywhere from 11% to 13%.  Chairman Haynie said he thought the Board was in consensus to increase both rates to 8%.  Commissioner Monaghan said he thinks the meter charge rate is regressive when it comes to residents.  He said it is a bigger percentage of a low income household than the medium or higher income household.  Commissioner Monaghan said this whole thing started in 2000 with the flat CMOM charge.  Commissioner Hancock pointed out that is when Metro started to maintain the sewer system.  Commissioner Monaghan said Metro went from the flat $8 CMOM charge to the basic facility charge of $8.45 and then to the meter size charge in 2007.  Commissioner Monaghan wanted to know how much money does Metro receive from the resident meter charge with the 8% increase.  Manager Coleman handed out information on how much money Metro will receive from the straight 8% increase for residential, commercial and industrial for both meter and volumetric charges.  Commissioner Monaghan said he wants to know what the 8% increase represents on residential.  Manager Coleman responded $51,000 more dollars.  Commissioner Monaghan stated he thinks Metro should freeze the residential base meter charge.  He said this rate is affecting people that live in the mill villages.  Commissioner Monaghan said residential users are different from commercial and industrial users.  Commissioner Burke asked how much more money per residential user is Metro talking about.  Manager Coleman replied $.64.  Chairman Haynie said nothing is ever static.  Commissioner Monaghan stated Social Security and fixed income is static.  He said the little old lady in the mill village is static.  Chairman Haynie said all of those are given a cost of living adjustment each year.  He said Metro talked about an 8% across the board increase.  There are a lot of agencies to help people and Metro is trying to run a utility business based on the rates.  Commissioner Monaghan said he did not know Metro would be increasing the base meter rate.  Commissioner Hancock said there was a consensus on the 8% increase.  Commissioner Monaghan said he does not like to see the residential base meter rate increase every year.  Chairman Haynie commented that he would not like to see any of the rates increase.  Commissioner Monaghan said he thinks if you use it you should have to pay for it, but the base meter rate is something different.  Commissioner Monaghan said Metro could change the way they are doing the Capacity Fee; in his view the Capacity Fee should be assessed when the house is built and sold.  Commissioner Monaghan said if Metro is paying for future expansion should that not come from the Capacity Fee not the little old lady in the mill village on a fixed income.  He said the problem is Metro charges the developer the Capacity Fee.  At CPW they charge the Impact Fee when the house is sold and that fee is included in the mortgage.  Commissioner Hancock said that is completely different between the two utilities.  He said CPW is trying to stay out of debt all of the time and Metro is trying to stay in as much debt as possible to stretch the cost out.  Commissioner Monaghan said he would rather recover on the Capacity Fee on new expansion rather than on the base meter charge but that would discourage development.  Chairman Haynie said Metro has to reserve the capacity based on the plans.  Commissioner Monaghan said in California they charge the Impact Fee when the house is sold.  Manger Coleman said they are charged the Transmission (Tapping) Fee when they buy the house.  Commissioner Monaghan said they are charged the Impact Fee too.  Commissioner Hancock said the Capacity Fee is needed ahead of time to help finance the expansion of the plants and the transmission system.  He said the developers are reserving space in the treatment plants with the Capacity Fee.  Commissioner Hancock said Metro agreed that when they were within a million gallons of capacity they would expand the plants and it takes time to expand a wastewater treatment plant.  He said a wastewater treatment plant is different from a water treatment plant.  Chairman Haynie said Metro has established that the Capacity Fee does not fully cover the cost.  Manager Coleman said the proposed rate would raise the total of the Capacity and Transmission Fees from $1000 to $1100.  Commissioner Burke said he understands the concern, but his biggest problem is that Metro has a deal where they are going to raise the rates on average of 8% for the next 5 to 6 years.  Chairman Haynie noted that Metro is already behind on sewer revenue.  Manager Coleman said if Metro was to hold the base meter rate the same, they would need to increase the volumetric rate by 11% and 13%.  Commissioner Monaghan said he would like to know if it is required by law that Metro charges the Capacity Fee upfront.  Mr. Hemphill said the only law he has seen regarding the Capacity/Impact Fee is there has to be a rational nexus as to the amount.  He said Metro has run into collection problems when the Capacity Fee is not collected upfront.  Mr. Hemphill said legally he is not sure, but from a practical standpoint if Metro does not get the money upfront they may never receive the money.  Commissioner Monaghan said then Metro may want to turn the sewer off if they have not received the money.  Commissioner Burke said the way DHEC regulations are Metro has to send a letter to accept, own, operate and maintain the system before DHEC will issue a permit to operate.  He said currently Metro requires that payment before they write the letter to own, operate and maintain.  After the letter is written, Metro has no leverage.  Manager Coleman said once Metro commits to that, they have to reserve the capacity whether it is used or not.  Commissioner Burke said Metro does have the leverage not to turn the tap on for each homeowner.  Commissioner Monaghan said that is what he is talking about.  He said Metro is going to collect $650 for the Capacity Fee, but tax the little old lady in the mill village to get $51,000 a year.  Manager Coleman said Metro just went through a whole new rate study and adopted it February, 2007 for what was deemed a fair rate structure.  Commissioner Monaghan said he did not realize the base meter rate was going up and that is his fault.  Commissioner Burke said Commissioner Monaghan is talking about changing something for one year, but the plan put in place was for 5 years not 1 year.  Chairman Haynie said Metro needs to adopt the rates for this year and there is a plan in place that he thought the Board was in agreement on. 

 

Commissioner Hancock made a motion to advertise the rates with an 8% across the board increase and $50 increase to the Capacity and Transmission Fees; Commissioner Burke seconded, the motion was approved.  Commissioner Monaghan voted no. 

 

Mr. Hemphill inquired if the Board wants to hold the public hearing at the end of the month.  Chairman Haynie responded Metro will hold the public hearing based on an appropriate advertising period.  Mr. Hemphill said the minimum is once ten days prior.  Manager Coleman said Metro will advertise three times. 

 

VIII.   Commissioner Smith made a motion to go into Executive Session to receive legal advice; Commissioner Hancock seconded, and the motion was unanimously approved. 

 

IX.  The meeting returned to open session.  No action was taken during executive session.

 

X.     Commissioner Monaghan inquired if anybody at Metro is serious about tagging the assets.  Manager Coleman responded both Mrs. Grogan and Mrs. Meyer have been working on this, but it is not finished.  Commissioner Monaghan said he would feel comfortable if an inventory count is done once a year that is matched against the books.  Commissioner Burke said he is more concerned about removing items that are no longer on inventory.  Commissioner Monaghan stated the inventory should be run by the accounting department with the auditors helping.  Mr. Martin said everything at TSF has been tagged.  The list has never been compared to what is on the books.  Commissioner Hancock said until Metro started to maintain items they did not have an inventory.  Commissioner Monaghan said the inventory count is usually scheduled a month or so before the audit starts.  Commissioner Monaghan said the equipment should be tagged.  Mr. Martin replied the equipment is tagged.  Chairman Haynie said Metro may want to look into getting a bar code system.  Mr. Martin responded that is what Metro uses.  Commissioner Monaghan suggested a target date be set for when everything is going to be ready and a date for when the physical inventory count is going to be done. 

 

XI.  With no further business, the meeting was adjourned.

 

 

 

Use Advanced Search