|
Public
Menu - 2006 Minutes
- 2007 Minutes
Commission Minutes
Amended
GREENWOOD METROPOLITAN DISTRICT
MINUTES OF THE
march 28, 2007
Regular Hearing
The regular meeting of the
Greenwood Metropolitan District Commission was held
Wednesday, March 28, 2007 at 3:00 p.m., in the Board Room of
CPW/Greenwood Metropolitan District Administrative Building,
121 West Court Avenue.
In attendance:
Tim Burke Richard
Coleman Brian Waldrep
Bob Haynie George
Martin Bill Moore
Gene Hancock Richard Gentry
Danny Ware
Michael G. Monaghan Gayle Grogan
Thomas Cannon
Byron Smith
Roy Hemphill
Bill Weeks
Henry Watts Paige Holley
-
Chairman Haynie called the meeting to order and George
Martin gave the invocation.
-
Chairman Haynie welcomed Mr. Tim Burke as he began his
service as a Greenwood Metropolitan District
Commissioner.
-
Chairman Haynie gave the statement of compliance with
the notification provision of the Freedom of Information
Act.
-
Bids
for New Haven Line Replacement
Bidder
Amount
Chandler Construction
$44,483
Goodwater,
Inc. $63,400
The engineer’s estimate was
$72,000.
Staff will review the bids
to assure compliance with the specifications. If the bid is
in compliance, the bid will be awarded to the apparent low
bidder, Chandler Construction, at the next Board Meeting.
-
Wilson Creek Update
-
Mr. Ware provided the Board with handouts regarding
phase 1A. The vertical dash line on the time line
represents the status of the contractor as of last
week. The yellow highlighted items are ahead of
schedule. Overall the project is at or ahead of the
contractor’s schedule, which is the contractor’s
late schedule. The contractor needs to pour a small
amount of concrete on clarifier #1 before it is
completed. This is scheduled for next week.
Regarding the masonry, the block is done and the
brick is halfway completed. The roof slabs should
arrive within the next few weeks. The weather has
been great and has allowed the contractor to be
ahead of schedule. Mr. Ware explained an updated
handout of the change orders and pictures of the
construction. Change order # 8 and change order #9
have been added. Change order #8 was discussed at
the last Board Meeting. Change order #9 is for the
poor soil condition encountered outside of clarifier
#1 effluent structure for $3,656. Commissioner
Monaghan inquired if the minutes contain any motions
regarding the approval of the change orders.
Manager Coleman responded that the Board approves
all of the change orders over $10,000. Commissioner
Monaghan asked if change orders #6, #7 and #8 were
formally approved. Manager Coleman responded that
they were approved if they are over $10,000.
Commissioner Monaghan stated that the Board should
approve all change orders no matter the amount of
the change order. Commissioner Monaghan stated that
normally the general manager has the authority to
spend up to $10,000 without the Board’s approval.
Commissioner Hancock stated that this is not within
that parameter. Commissioner Smith stated that he
thought the Board was to approve the change order
even if they are approved after the fact.
Commissioner Burke stated that it might be helpful
if on the change order summary the approval dates of
the change order are included. Mr. Ware stated that
from an overall standpoint phase 1A is going well.
SCDHEC has the construction permit request for phase
1B. Davis and Floyd is working on electrical,
structural and mechanical issues. Manager Coleman
inquired of the anticipated bid date for phase 1B.
Mr. Ware responded that they hope it will be in
September. Commissioner Monaghan asked if Metro had
a time penalty on this project. Mr. Ware responded,
yes. Commissioner Monaghan stated that the
contractor is going to pay the penalty. Mr. Ware
responded the contractor is aware of the penalty and
included the liquidated damages in the bid price.
-
Commissioner Monaghan made a motion to approve change
orders #1 through #9; Commissioner Hancock seconded, and
the motion was unanimously approved.
VII.
Commissioner Hancock made a motion that the minutes
from the March 14, 2007 Regular Meeting be approved as
mailed and Commissioner Smith seconded. The motion was
unanimously approved.
VIII.
Financial Report
a.
Chairman Haynie asked for questions from the Board on
the Financial Report. Manager Coleman stated the operating
revenue is down; about $60,000 is due to some industrial
payment received the first of March. The revenue is below
the budgeted amount. Manager Coleman crossed checked to see
if the water billing amounts were down also. It appears to
be from the normal winter usage. The revenue is expected to
increase during the summer months. Chairman Haynie asked if
this is based on historical trends. Manager Coleman
responded that historically less water is used in the winter
than the summer. Commissioner Monaghan requested for Mrs.
Grogan to provide him with information regarding the total
interest income for FY06 and the total bond interest for
FY06. Chairman Haynie inquired about the sewer service
income because the new rates were effective February 1,
2007. Manager Coleman responded generally what is billed in
February will be collected in March. Commissioner Monaghan
inquired on the status of the website. Manager Coleman
responded that it is being worked on. Commissioner Monaghan
stated that if we cannot figure out what the rates are what
the hell is the consumer to do. Commissioner Monaghan asked
when will this be done. Manager Coleman responded that the
information will be given to Jeff Auman this afternoon or
tomorrow morning. Commissioner Monaghan stressed that this
is an important item that will need to be done as soon as
possible. Manager Coleman stated that the rates are posted
on the website and the problem has to do with the flat
rate. Commissioner Monaghan stated that you cannot look
there and tell what it is. Commissioner Monaghan referred
to page 4 under the County Treasurer. He was under the
impression that the money would no longer be there in 2007
and that the money was going to be used against the 2006 GO
bond. Manager Coleman responded that the payment is not
until June 1, 2007. Commissioner Monaghan asked what will
be left after the GO bond is paid. Manager Coleman
responded there may be a remaining balance. Commissioner
Monaghan asked why the proceeds are $2 million. Chairman
Haynie said some of the money has already been spent.
Commissioner Monaghan asked if there is a payment schedule
for the GO Bond. Mrs. Grogan referred the Board to page 10
of the packet. Commissioner Monaghan stated the amounts do
not add up to $4 million. Mrs. Grogan stated those are the
pay requests to date. Commissioner Monaghan stated that
according to the report Metro is saying we only have $2
million left. Mrs. Grogan stated the bond was for $3.1
million. Commissioner Monaghan asked if Metro was going to
have $1.4 million left. Manager Coleman responded that
there was an amount of money at the start of the year; Metro
has not collected anymore tax revenue. A payment was made
in April and October of the already outstanding bonds. The
balance remaining was approximately $3.1 million that the
County would not allow Metro to spend. Metro in turned
issued a bond for $3.1 million for these projects to be paid
for out of those reserves. Commissioner Monaghan asked
about the $1.4 million. Mrs. Grogan said Metro will have
bond payments for the 1999 bond and the 2004 GO bond this
month. Those payments will come out that account. Manager
Coleman stated that should just about zero the account.
Commissioner Monaghan asked when will the County issue a
tax. Manager Coleman responded that the County will issue a
tax for the projected interest and principle payment for the
following year. He also stated that the 2006 bond will be
paid off during this year. Commissioner Monaghan asked if
any vehicles or large trucks will be purchased before the
end of the year. Manager Coleman responded that the large
format printer and a generator have just been received but
more than likely will be paid in April. Commissioner
Monaghan wanted to make sure Metro is recognizing capital
assets and depreciating them. Commissioner Watts inquired
to the status of the City Pond project. Mr. Martin
responded that Metro is working on it now. Commissioner
Monaghan asked if Metro only spent $11,000 on the Lander
project. Mr. Martin responded that the punch list items
have not been completed and we have not received a bill from
the contractor. Commissioner Watts inquired about the
Cambridge Avenue project. Mr. Martin responded that Metro
has two Cambridge Avenue projects. One is the big rehab
project and should be bid on within the next couple of
weeks. The other is the Bailey Circle project.
Commissioner Watts inquired about the project that is
running parallel to the railroad. Commissioner Hancock
responded that is the Cokesbury project. Commissioner
Monaghan asked about the penalty for the Bailey Circle
project. Mr. Martin stated that Metro is holding the money;
$800 a day. Commissioner Monaghan asked if Metro has enough
money to cover it. Mr. Martin responded that Metro has
enough to cover it. He also stated that at some point in
time Metro may want to finish the project themselves.
Chairman Haynie asked if the project is finished. Mr.
Martin responded that there are some punch list items left.
Commissioner Monaghan asked if the $800 a day keeps going.
Commissioner Watts asked if the contractor is working on the
project. Mr. Martin responded that the contractor knows
what needs to be done, but chooses not to come. Chairman
Haynie asked if Metro retains the penalty until the
completion and then refunds the balance. Mr. Hemphill
stated that is how he thinks Metro should handle it.
Commissioner Monaghan asked if Metro has sent letters to the
contractor. Mr. Martin responded that the contractor is
aware that the penalty will be enforced. Commissioner
Monaghan asked if anything was sent to the contractor in
writing. Mr. Martin stated that Marion Boone was instructed
to send a letter, but he will confirm it was done.
Commissioner Burke asked who is the contractor for the
project. Mr. Martin responded D.R. Terry is the contractor.
IX.
Action Items
-
Request to Receive Bids of Permanent Flow Meters
Chairman Haynie stated that
this is not a budgeted item; roughly the cost will be
$90,000 including installation. Mr. Martin stated that the
staff is asking for permission to receive bids for that
service. Commissioner Hancock stated that if Metro wants to
find out about inflow there is no way to do it without
permanent flow meters. Commissioner Monaghan asked for an
explanation of the benefits of permanent flow meters. Mr.
Martin explained that Metro would have constant monitoring
of the flow in nine strategic parts of the collections
system. This information would be sent to computers at the
plants. At any time during the day Metro would know the
flow. It will help us isolate where Metro needs to spend
the money on rehab. Manager Coleman stated that it will
allow us to measure the effectiveness of the rehab.
Commissioner Monaghan stated that Metro had a study done.
Commissioner Hancock stated that it was done when we were
designing the upgrades to the Wilson Creek Plant. Mr.
Martin stated that a study is a snapshot of what happened at
that time. He also said that the permanent flow meters will
provide us a record of constant history of what happens at
all times. Commissioner Monaghan stated that Metro could
spend $90,000 studying the water leaks or stop the water
leaks. Chairman Haynie stated that the permanent flow
meters can direct Metro as to where they should spend the
money. Manager Coleman stated that the flow study that was
done was about a six to eight week study. It helped us to
determine what would be a 2 year, 5 year and 10 year storm
event. Commissioner Monaghan asked if Metro thought it was
worth $90,000. Mr. Martin responded that he believed it
could be worth millions of dollars.
All of the Commissioners
were in agreement for Metro to receive bids on permanent
flow meters.
-
Value of the GMD portion of the Administration
Building
Mr. Waldrep presented the
Commissioners with an updated proposed expansion drawing of
the Technical Service Facility (TSF). Chairman Haynie
stated that Metro will sell CPW their portion of the
Administration Building and then Metro will use those
proceeds plus more money to expand the TSF. Mr. Waldrep
explained that the original master plan was to expand on the
left side of the building toward the parking lot. Metro
will also expand on the right side of the building
approximately sixty five feet. The expansion is around
10,000 square feet. Offices were grouped (i.e. financial
area, collections area, maintenance area, etc.).
Commissioner Monaghan stated that at some point the Board
will interview architects to do the formal drawing.
Commissioner Monaghan asked if bathrooms will be available
on both sides. Mr. Waldrep stated that bathrooms have been
added off the manager and assistance manager offices and in
the women’s locker rooms. Restrooms can be installed on
both sides, but Metro may need to install some pump
systems. Commissioner Watts inquired about “Collections”.
Mr. Waldrep responded that is Wayne Daniel’s department and
he has the largest group of employees that maintain the
sewer system. Chairman Haynie inquired if the large room
would be cubicles. Mr. Waldrep responded that the details
have not been formalized, but the plans are for each
employee to have their own workstation. The training room
area was doubled. Commissioner Monaghan commented on the
number of offices and wanted to know if all of them were
designated. Mr. Martin responded that not all of them are
designated. Commissioner Monaghan inquired if there are
employees Metro anticipates on hiring. Mr. Martin responded
that this is just a conceptual footprint. Chairman Haynie
responded that Metro would want to have room to grow.
Chairman Haynie asked what would be the next logical step.
The next step would be to hire an architectural firm to
complete the design. Mr. Moore stated that he believed that
Davis and Floyd had been selected as the architect.
Commissioner Monaghan stated that the Board had not voted to
select an architectural firm. Chairman Haynie stated that
he does not recall selecting Davis and Floyd, but knows that
they have helped Metro. Manager was directed to solicit
Request for Proposals from local architectural firms.
Chairman Haynie asked if CPW has a certain date for the bond
closing that CPW is issuing. Chairman Haynie asked if Metro
would delay CPW if Metro waits until Commissioner Burke has
been fully informed of the situation. Manager Coleman
stated according to Mr. Reeves the bond issue should be
within two months. Chairman Haynie stated that Metro will
take formal action at the next regular meeting. Mr.
Hemphill added that the Board will need to vote and include
a written agreement stating what is to be sold. Chairman
Haynie inquired as to when the next bond would be issued.
Mrs. Grogan responded that it would be determined by the
Board. Mr. Hemphill stated that Metro will need to work out
a closing date and an agreement for Metro employees to
remain in the present building until the new building is
ready. Chairman Haynie directed staff to present a time
line to the Board at the next meeting. Commissioner
Monaghan stated that the staff can start gathering
information for the bid packets for potential architects.
Mr. Waldrep provided an updated handout of the proposed new
layout for buildings B & C. Metro has grown since TSF was
built in the number of employees and the amount of
equipment. Some of the new equipment needs to be in a
heated and covered space. In regards to building B, Metro
would like to add sixty more feet of bay space. In building
C there is a small heated space; Metro would like to enclose
three bays with walls. Commissioner Monaghan asked if that
was really necessary. Mr. Martin responded that the heated
covered space and more bay space was needed. The purpose of
this was to make the Board aware that we are looking at more
space for building B & C. Mr. Martin stated that Metro has
a lot of equipment that is weather sensitive. Commissioner
Monaghan stated that he thought that is why the existing
buildings were built. Mr. Martin responded that it is, but
the space is full.
-
Mr. Martin stated that Metro has sent information to
Palmetto Utility Protection Services (PUPS) and are
waiting to hear from them.
-
Mr. Martin informed the Board that Metro’s operation
challenge team won the state championship. The team
won four out of five events. The team members were:
Sam Robinson, Kevin Fleming, Jay Reynolds and Travis
Brownlee. They now have the chance to compete for
the national championship in San Diego, CA, in
October. South Carolina will pay $5,000 toward
their trip. Chairman Haynie directed the staff to
provide the Board with an estimated travel expense
report for the trip.
-
Commissioner Hancock made a motion to go into Executive
Session to receive legal advice and discuss a personnel
matter; Commissioner Smith seconded, and the motion was
unanimously approved.
-
The
meeting returned to open session. No action was taken
during executive session.
XII.
The Commission directed staff to contact CDM
regarding a proposal to review the design manual. The
proposal will be presented to the Commission at the next
board meeting.
XIII.
With no further business, the meeting was adjourned.
Approved April 11,
2007
______________________________
Secretary
|